|
|
Discrimination
claims form the basis of many wrongful termination
suits. There are both federal and state laws prohibiting discrimination
in employment. For a variety of reasons, we recommend that, whenever
possible, our clients pursue their discrimination claims in a state
court under state law.
California’s anti-discrimination statute
is called the “Fair Employment & Housing Act” (“FEHA”)
and is part of the Government Code. This law protects the right
of all persons to seek, obtain, and hold employment without discrimination
based on race, religion, color, national origin,
ancestry, physical or mental disability,
medical condition, marital status, sex, sexual orientation, age
(at least 40), or pregnancy.
What Employers Are Covered?
FEHA defines “employer” as “any
person regularly employing five or more persons,
or any person acting as an agent of an employer.”
There is one important exception to the five-employee
requirement: the prohibition against harassment
applies to anyone who regularly employs at least one person
or regularly receives the services of at least one independent contractor.
Public employers,
including the State of California, cities, counties, local agencies,
special districts, and any other political or civil subdivision,
must comply with FEHA regardless of how many people they employ.
FEHA exempts religious organizations
that are not organized for private profit, subject to special rules
for religious organizations that provide health care.
How Do I Prove Discrimination?
There are generally two theories for proving discrimination:
• Disparate treatment
occurs when an employer
treates an individual less favorably than
others because of the individual’s protected
status – for example, his or her race, religion,
sex, sexual orientation or age.
•Disparate impact
occurs when an employer has an employment practice or a selection
policy that
appears neutral but has a disproportionate
adverse impact on members of a protected group.
Is Some Discrimination Lawful?
• Disparate Treatment.
Decisions to discharge, take other adverse employment actions,
or to refuse to hire an applicant for employment may be lawful if
the employer was entitled to consider protected status as a job
requirement. This defense is known as a bona fide occupational
qualification.
• Disparate
Impact. An employment practice or selection policy may be
lawful because it is necessary to the
employer’s business.
What Damages Are Recoverable?
In a civil action under FEHA, damages for lost earnings, including
future lost earnings in certain circumstances, and for emotional
distress may be recovered -- if proven. Punitive damages against
a private employer may also be awarded if there is clear and convincing
evidence of malice, oppression or fraud. Under FEHA, the court also
has discretion to award reasonable attorney’s fees and costs,
including expert witness fees, to the prevailing party.
What If I Quit?
Discrimination, retaliation or harassment in employment often leads
an employee to decide to quit -- usually feeling powerless to do
anything about it or too upset to continue to go to work.
You may still have a claim for damages if the discrimination is
proven even though you resigned and weren’t discharged. But
your decision to resign will be scrutinized and will have to be
explained.
If you have a reasonable opportunity to complain about the conduct
to a person in authority but don’t do so, this failure on
your part will be questioned and even criticized later. Your employer
will undoubtedly argue that you did not really want the conduct
to stop -- you just wanted a lawsuit -- a chance at the “litigation
lottery,” as many employers like to call it.
When in doubt, and if circumstances permit, get competent legal
advice before you quit.
Is There Any Step I Should/Must Take Before Suing?
•Using Internal
Complaint Procedures. If you believe that you are the victim
of discrimination, harassment, or retaliation while you are still
employed, you may have an obligation to report the misconduct in
an effort to stop or remedy the wrongful conduct. There may be reasons
why you do not wish to make a report but, if you sue, you will have
to convince a judge or jury that your reasons were good reasons.
•Using FEHA’s
Complaint Procedures. Before pursuing a civil suit under
FEHA, a person who believes that he/she is the victim of an employer’s
violation of the state’s anti-discrimination laws, must first
file a complaint with the state’s Department of Fair Employment
& Housing (“DFEH”). The complaint is signed under
penalty of perjury and must specifically identify the alleged
unlawful conduct and the names of all the people being accused.
For more information about DFEH and its services, visit www.dfeh.ca.gov
or call 1-800-884-1684. The DFEH office in San Diego can be reached
at 619-645-2681.
What are the Time Limits?
In general, a complaint must be filed with the
DFEH within one year after the date of
the alleged unlawful act of discrimination, harassment or retaliation.
[Caution: The time limits for filing with the federal EEOC
are shorter.]
You are not alone. See how we will help.
Sexual Harassment
Disability/Pregnancy Discrimination
Wrongful Termination
Legal Team
Thomas
L. Tosdal Position:
Partner
Admitted to Bar: 1975, California; U.S. District
Court, Southern and Central Districts of California; U.S. Court of
Appeals, Ninth Circuit and U.S. Supreme Court.
Education: University of California at Santa Barbara
(B.A., high honors, 1971); Harvard University (J.D., cum laude, 1975).
Of Note: Listed in The Best Lawyers in America (Labor
Specialty). Law Clerk, Honorable Edward J. Schwartz, Chief Judge,
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, 1975-1976.
Staff Counsel, Agricultural Labor Relations Board, State of California,
1976-1978. Private Practice, 1978 --.
Member: Association of Trial Lawyers, Consumer Attorneys
of California, Consumer Attorneys of San Diego, American Inns of Court,
San Diego County Bar Association, and State Bar of California.
Ann
M. Smith
Position: Partner
Admitted to Bar: 1985, California and U.S. District
Court, Southern District of California; U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth
Circuit.
Education: Simmons College; Monterey College of Law
(J.D., cum laude, 1985).
Of Note: 1993 Recipient, Outstanding Trial Lawyer
Award, San Diego Trial Lawyers Association. Labor Negotiator for United
Farm Workers of America 1976-1981 and for San Diego Municipal Employees
Association 1986--.
Member: Consumer Attorneys of California, Consumer Attorneys of San
Diego, San Diego County Bar Association, and State Bar of California.
Languages: Spanish.
Reported Cases: Salgado v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
(9th Cir. 1987) 823F 2nd 1322. Branch v. Homefed Bank (1992) 6 CA.
4th 793.
Fern
M. Steiner Position:
Partner
Admitted to Bar: 1977, Illinois; 1978, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of Illinois and U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh
Circuit; 1985, California, U.S. District Court, Southern District
of California and U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit; 1987, U.S.
District Court, Northern and Central Districts of California.
Education: Northwestern University (B.A., 1971);
John Marshall Law School (J.D., cum laude, 1977).
Of Note: Listed in The Best Lawyers in America (Labor
Specialty).
Author: "Interference with Rights of Employees,"
Labor Law for the General Practitioner, Chapter 4, 1984.
Member: American Bar Association, Industrial Relations
Research Association, AFL-CIO Lawyers Coordinating Committee, National
Lawyers Guild and its Labor & Employment Committee, San Diego
Bar Association, and State Bar of California.
Jon
Y. Vanderpool
Position: Partner
Admitted to Bar: 1992, California; 1995, Massachusetts;
and U.S. District Court, Southern, Central, and Northern Districts
of California.
Education: Rice University (B.A., 1986); Pepperdine
University (J.D., 1992).
Member: American Inns of Court, San Diego County
Bar Association, and State Bar of California.
Note:
Nothing on this page should be construed as a legal opinion regarding
any claim you may have. For a legal opinion, please speak with an
attorney. |